Not A Circus Act…

Past work I want to develop further….

As said before I want to do a solo performance about becoming disabled/my disability using physical theatre. The idea to do this came from a past piece of work that I, and my group, devised. What I want to do is to use this performance and develop it into a solo piece. I also plan to perhaps use monologues and perhaps projection as well as I feel that this might be the best way to tell the story I want to tell. The thing I really loved about this past piece is that it really shows what I can do, physically and that physical theatre is a performance style that allows me to move in and out of my chair. My wheelchair is also like another performer. It has it’s own presence, it’s own energy and it’s a quite a powerful object because of it’s, generally speaking, negative connotations. Wheelchairs are generally associated  to illness and tragedy so I think by using the chair in ways it’s not designed for perhaps makes people realise that at the end of the day, it’s just a chair. The person who uses the wheelchair and the wheelchair become separate. I think the image of the empty chair also has some interesting emotion to it. There is a section in this piece where all the performers are just looking at the wheelchair and there’s this pause. This pause feels tense, for us as performers it’s because we know that the next section is the longest and most important so the others are waiting for me to start the section and for the audience they are waiting for something to happen. Waiting for someone to either move the chair or to get in it, for the owner of the chair has not been established. It may be obvious because I have walked with crutches and used the chair briefly in one of the earlier sections but I have not sat in it. I have not actually made it explicitly clear that it is my chair. So I feel that an empty wheelchair is a very dynamic imagine that I want to use, perhaps at the start of my piece. I might try experimenting with the start of the show, maybe start with the chair empty so that audiences focus is the chair to begin with not the performer. There is a lot of things that I can test and play with in terms of the wheelchair. Despite the fact that my wheelchair, in a sense, is the biggest obstacle perhaps in my everyday life, on stage it is actually freeing and interesting things to work with as there is so much that I can actually use it for.

I have also done a solo movement piece before, when I was in college and had only just become disabled. In this piece I have limited movement compared to the video above because I had not the strength or ability to move much at that time. This video is also from a rehearsal of the piece so it was not as ‘polished’ as it was in the final show.

 

So I went to see the movie The Greatest Showman…wasn’t overly impressed but it gave my some things to think about for my solo performance…

The reason why I was not a fan of the film was because it romanticised the idea of “freak shows” and it implied that the only place someone who is disabled or different can “feel at home” is in a circus, however this also made me think about my solo performance and whether I should try and relate it almost back to this freak show/ circus idea. One of the first thoughts the film gave me was whether I should maybe stage the show in the round. Circuses are set in the round so I thought, when I actually start the rehearsal process, I might experiment with staging my audience in this setting. The reason I want to test this idea is because I want to do my performance about my disability and my experience of changing from abled-bodied to disabled, and the thing that has changed the most since losing my ability to walk is the fact that I get stared at and made to feel like a “freak”. Placing the show in the round, or if not this but in somehow relating the show back to the idea of a freak show, I hope to perhaps make people a bit uncomfortable. I do want to use physical theatre for my piece so staging in the round might not be possible , however I really like the idea of somehow linking back to freak shows, even if it’s just via a monologue or through costume. I think, this is just ideas at the moment, that maybe if I try to set up the feeling of a freak show then strip it back to my story, the reality of being disabled not some sob-story or “inspiring” circus act, that might be affective. Reinforcing the idea, maybe, that I’m not some circus act rather I’m just a human being. Another thing that Greatest Showman made me realise was that only disabled audience members found the show offensive. There was a complete perspective difference from the disabled community and disabled critics to the abled-bodied critics.  Abled-bodied audience members have raved about the film and make out that its some inspiring story about a “normal” man giving some “different” people a place to express themselves without realising the truth behind it. The real life  P.T. Barnum popularized the idea of freak shows in America. Or , in more cynical terms, he helped make the dehumanization of disabled people as a form of entertainment popular. He also bought and sold slaves and people with disabilities and then showcased them in museums and circuses. Yet the movie makes out that he was some great friend to the disabled community. Again this began to give me some ideas for solo performance. This idea of dehumanization. The idea that as a disabled person I am less than human, or at least am considered that way by some. I begun to taught maybe I could do something with this idea, like perhaps telling my story and then quickly switching into a another character to talk about it from an outside put of view. The ringleader outfit caught my attention so I thought that maybe this other character could be dressed as a ringleader, to link back to the idea of freak shows.  At the moment everything is just ideas, want I now need to start doing is physically rehearsing and testing out these ideas.

 

gallery-1513337323-the-greatest-showman-cast-hugh-jackman

Chewiwie, Gray and Abramovic…

During our sessions we have looked at a number of different solo artists and the work these artists have produced.

Matt Chewiwie: 

First we looked at Matt Chewiwie’s artistic statement and were asked “to what extent is Chewiwie an artist?”. The question was actually more complex than it first seemed for to answer that question, you first have to ask “what is an artist?”. It seems hard to judge whether or not Chewiwie is an artist without defining what an artist is, however defining what an artists is can differ from person to person. Coming from a fine art background, when I hear the word “artist”, I think of Jean-Michel Basquiat, Vincent Van Gogh, Leonardo Da Vinci and other painters and I would not necessarily think of performance artists such as Chewiwie. Although that does not mean that I do not think he is an artist. If I was to describe his work I would probably describe him as a performance artist or as a performer as, in my opinion, the term “artist” is to closely linked to fine art and Chewiwie’s work would not fit into that category. That is just my opinion however for work like Chewiwies might be different to Da Vinci but it is still apart of an art form. Also given that Chewiwie defines himself as an artist, I am hardly in a position to disagree with him for, Chewiwie’s work fits his into definition of an “artist”.

The Oxford dictionary defines the term artist as:

A person who creates paintings or drawings as a profession or hobby.

  1. 1.1 A person who practises or performs any of the creative arts, such as a sculptor, film-maker, actor, or dancer.
  2. 1.2 A person skilled at a particular task or occupation.
    ‘a surgeon who is an artist with the scalpel’

Chewiwie’s work does fit into this definition of an artist.  Chewiwie does not make it clear, however, what his work actually is in his artist statement which is why his use of the word “artist” seemed questionable.  Chewiwie also refers to himself as an entertainer. This is opens up the question of whether there’s a difference between being an entertainer and being an artist. I would say that to be an entertainer and to be an artist are two different things. People on shows such as Big Brother are entertainers given that their sole purpose, on those shows, is to entertain the viewers yet I would not describe them as artists. While an artist might entertain, their focus, I believe, should be in their “art”. Whereas an entertainers focus is to entertain.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4yJPZfFOrsc

After seeing his work however I think that Chewiwie is in his an artist even though personally I would probably call him a performer but that would just be my preference. I can not argue that Chewiwie is not an artist given that everyone’s opinion on what is an artist is different. Perhaps art is something that should not be over thought about, for it is something that at the end of the day comes down to personal preference. I also really liked Chewiwie’s  performance. It was performed very casually and naturally which I liked as it seemed to invite the audience in. It was as if he was having a conversation with friends rather than performing. This might be a useful style to use in my own performance.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoouBqguWzg

Marina Abramovic:

Marina Abramovic was the only performer I had already heard of, out of the ones studied so far, so some of her work I knew about. Although I can appreciate the ideas behind her work, I do not like Abramovic’s performance style. The only performance of hers that I do like is The Artist Is Present as I find the simple-ness of this piece is effective.  The piece is a one to one performance that involves Abramovic sitting facing a member of the public. The member of the public is invited to sit opposite Abramovic for as long as they wish to. Abramovic does not speak to them, they simply look at each other. There is something about how simple this piece is that I find intriguing. There are photos of participants crying after sitting opposite Abramovic, so it seems that in that simple moment there was something touching or moving that the participants really responded with. I think this piece shows that sometimes you do not need to do a lot to do something people respond to. The fact that Abramovic is staring right at the participant, gives the participant nowhere to hide which is why some who are uncomfortable with this leave quickly. Although I think that it is unlikely that I will use any of Abramovic’s performance styles, looking at her work does show that you can do a lot with a little and that perhaps a small idea could be an affective one.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6Qj__s8mNU

 

Spalding Gray:

The next performer we looked at was Spalding Gray and his piece Swimming to Cambodia. The piece was really interesting as it jumped around in topic quickly that it was hard to tell what the “point” to the piece was. Gray also started from the audience, he came in, after the audience had sat down, from where audience had entered instead of being found on stage. He then sat down and began to talk about a holiday gone wrong. It was quite a casual conversation that at times got louder and more dramatic. What was interesting to what was that seemingly small gestures, like taking a sip of water or a change in the lighting, would completely change the context of the conversation and the tone in which Gray was speaking. He went from talking in a dramatic tone about a drug high gone wrong to then talking more calmly and seriously about war and then returned after a lighting change to a lighter tone. The piece was very engaging to watch as I was not sure where it was going to go next. The use of sudden changes in the conversation meant that the piece at times seemed random yet all the pieces ended up sort of interlinking. The contrast between the funny and serious meant that the piece, although at times talking about serious topics, was not too heavy and the moments of laugher seemed to increase my attention to the moments of seriousness. It was very engaging to watch even though Gray actually did not really move. He used a lot of gestures but he remained in his same spot and did not stand up or move about. Another factor that worked well was the way Gray changed the tone of his voice to suit certain moments. For instance, when he was giving a exact time and date, his voice became cleaner and serious and sat in a set position which made him look a bit like a news reader. I really liked Gray’s style of performance and might look to include some of it in my own piece.

In class we did an exercise were we has to write a monologue and then change topic/ tone of the piece midway through. We could can this via a lighting effect or by a change in pace but it had to change the tone of the piece right as the piece was starting to build up, like how Gray does. I decided to write my monologue on the fits I used to have and then change the piece but suddenly talking about a lighter and somewhat random topic. What I also tried to do is, even in the random topic, mention something that kind of links into the topic of my seizures so that there is still something that links the two together.

The monologue:

[Slow pace, serious tone]

Non-epileptic seizures.

Unlike epileptic attacks, these seizures are not caused by disrupted electrical activity in the brain which means that they cannot be treated with the same medicine use to treat epilepsy.

Sometime these seizures come with a warning.

These warning would occur as my brain starts to dissociate and would come in the form of sudden loss of vision or sudden uncontrollable laugher.

Often there is no warning.

One minute I would be sat having a conversation…

The next minute I’d be collapsed on the ground.

My limbs shaking out of control and my joints continuous dislocating.

In socket, pop, out of socket, pop, back in socket.

The worst part is I’m partially conscious at the time.

I can feel my body shaking.

I can feel my joints dislocating.

But I can’t stop them.

I can’t do anything.

I have no control over my own body.

Then finally after a minute, or three, or five, or ten or even fifteen…

It stops.

My body goes limp.

But I still have no control.

The seizure has stopped…

But I can no longer see.

I can no longer hear.

I can no longer move.

I can no longer speak.

All I can do is breathe…

And even that is difficult.

After a couple of minutes hearing returns…

A couple more minutes and breathing returns…

Over an hour later some basic movement returns.

Three to five hours later sight returns.

Six to twelve hours later speech returns…

[Quicker pace, brighter tone]

I really like pandas. I mean they’re just so cute and cuddly. They’re also no longer endangered! Yay! I really like pandas. They’re just cute. There isn’t a better word to describe the other than cute. I think if I was an animal I’d want to be a panda. They just sit and get fat from bamboo all day. I could totally do that! Though realistically if I was an animal I’d probably be a sloth. Coz sloths sleep all day and so do I. Not because I’m lazy, though I am lazy, but because I have chronic fatigue…

 

First Ideas…

Topic ideas:

My first ideas in terms of a topic for my solo performance is to use my disability as a stimulus. I have Functional Neurological Disorder, a complex condition that effects the connection between my brain and my legs, as well as other areas in my body. My idea is to create an autobiographical piece that discuss my own story while also talking about the idea of teh disabled identity and gets rid of some of the stereotypes around disabilities. I was not born with my disability rather got it after catching a virus, nearly four years ago, that led to the development of my condition yet I don’t wish I was abled-bodied. I am happy and proud of my disabled identity which I think that a lot of abled-bodied people have difficulty understanding.

Although stand-up is not a performance style that I am particularly interested in exploring, the way Maysoon Zayid discuss her disability I find interesting. I do not want to create a performance about my disability which leaves the audience pitying me. I have no need for pity and I do not want it. I do not see my disability as a negative thing and I am quite happy the way I am. Maysoon does a brilliant job of talking about her disability in a way that does not invite pity which is something I can learn from…also I think she absolutely hilarious!

Performance style ideas:
Physical theatre is one of my favourite performance styles. One of the things I like about this style of performance is that ‘the primary means of creation occurs through the body rather than through the mind’ (Callery,2001,4), which allows a performer to express themselves physically rather than through dialogue. I am a wheelchair user which means that a lot of people think that I can not really move or do anything. This is not the case and I want to get rid of this idea.

DV8:
The video below is a clip from DV8’s Cost of living (2004) that features both disabled and abled-bodied performers. One of the things that, in my opinion, makes the piece really impressive is that the disabled performer leads the performance and is a powerful presence, not just an extra. It also takes a lot of physical strength to move the way he does. Physical strength is not something that is commonly associated with being disabled so this piece breaks stereotypes surrounding disability. Something I wish to try and do within my own piece.

Work Cited:

Alex Jackson(2016)Marka Danielle Performs Wheelchair Dance Routine at Shots With A Spin

. Available from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SzIfqPTJV0[accessed 5 February 2018].
Callery, D. (2001) Through the Body: A Practical Guide to Physical Theatre. New York: Routledge.
eGoSolidal (2012) The Cost of Living – DV8 Physical Theatre

. Available from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NShJJr1ztkM [accessed 5 February 2018].
TED (2014) I got 99 problems… palsy is just one | Maysoon Zayid

. Available fromhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=buRLc2eWGPQ [accessed 5 February 2018].